Knowledge Management for Living Library Model: A Case Study of Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
Supayotin Na Songkhla, Pijitra Jonsri, and Kridsana Yoopuang
Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand
Abstract—Library is considered as the educational sources both in and outside of the system. In order to foster and support the reading behavior, searching for new knowledge, researching including support the education which focus on the learner as a center. Together with the advanced information and telecommunication technology, it leads to development in all kinds of education particularly in the university’s library which needs to be adjusted in its own vision both in management and services according to the modern digital technology. This research is to study about the Living Library through thinking systems and applied to develop the Living Library in order to suit with the management. The result showed that the virtual library was combined in 4 factors as the following 1) services 2) activities 3) physical and 4) human resources. By conducting questionnaires, it found out that people who used the virtual library preferred it to improve all 4 factors. From the feedback of participants found that 85.58% supported the center’s physical change. 84.97% supported the human resources improvement. 82.29% supported the service improvement and 82.02% supported increasing activities.
Index Terms—living library, knowledge management, library operation
Cite: Supayotin Na Songkhla, Pijitra Jonsri, and Kridsana Yoopuang, "Knowledge Management for Living Library Model: A Case Study of Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University," Journal of Advanced Management Science, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 320-324, July 2016. doi: 10.12720/joams.4.4.320-324
Index Terms—living library, knowledge management, library operation
Cite: Supayotin Na Songkhla, Pijitra Jonsri, and Kridsana Yoopuang, "Knowledge Management for Living Library Model: A Case Study of Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University," Journal of Advanced Management Science, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 320-324, July 2016. doi: 10.12720/joams.4.4.320-324